Shak et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
| Daniel Shak, Shk Asset Management and Shk Diversified, LLC |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Futures Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00992 |
| February 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 ac Petition for Removal- Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
ORDER granting (276) Letter Motion for Extension of Time; granting (276) Letter Motion to Stay in case 1:15-cv-00992-LJL; granting (259) Letter Motion for Extension of Time; granting (259) Letter Motion to Stay in case 1:15-cv-00994-LJL; granting (259) Letter Motion for Extension of Time; granting (259) Letter Motion to Stay in case 1:15-cv-00995-LJL: The stay is continued until July 30, 2020. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 6/23/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00992-LJL, 1:15-cv-00994-LJL, 1:15-cv-00995-LJL (jwh)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION & ORDER: re: (51 in 1:15-cv-00992-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; re: (46 in 1:15-cv-0 0994-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC; re: (45 in 1:15-cv-00995-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The Court grants JP Morgan's motions to dismiss. Because the Court previously granted le ave to amend, and plaintiffs again failed to state a claim, this dismissal is with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions pending at docket number 51 in 15 Civ. 992; docket number 46 in 15 Civ. 994; and docket number 45 in 15 Civ. 995, and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/29/2016) (kl)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION & ORDER re: (19 in 1:15-cv-00995-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaints filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, (21 in 1:15-cv-00992-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaints filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, (20 in 1:15-cv-00994-PAE) MOTION to Dismiss the Complaints filed by J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., J.P. Morgan Futures Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants JP Morgan's motions to dismiss in their entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion pending at Dkt. 21 for 15 Civ. 992; Dkt. 20 for 15 Civ. 994; and Dkt. 19 for 15 Civ. 995. The Court grants plaintiffs leave to file amended complaints limited to their Sherman Act § 2 claims and the corresponding state-law cause of action, solely to permit plaintiffs, in the event that they are aware of facts that would rehabilitate these claims, to add such facts to their pleadings. Any Amended Complaints are due two weeks from today. If no such complaints are timely filed, the Court's dismissal will be with prejudice. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/12/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
