N.M. et al v. The New York City Department of Education
| N.M. and M.M. |
| The New York City Department of Education |
| 1:2015cv01781 |
| March 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has no shortage of sympathy for M.M.'s parents, who, no doubt, were motivated by the best of intentions in caring for their severely disabled daughter and have incurred their fair share of financial expenses in the p rocess. For the reasons explained above, however, the Court is compelled to conclude that their challenges to the decision of the SRO fall short and, thus, that they are not entitled to reimbursement for their decision to enroll M.M. at Cooke for the 2012-13 school year. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 14 and 20, and to close this case. S o ordered. re: 14 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion filed by N.M., M.M. 20 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The New York City Department of Education. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/24/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
