Bam Bags, LLC v. Zip-It Ltd.

Bam Bags, LLC v. Zip-It Ltd.

Plaintiff:	Bam Bags, LLC
Defendant:	Zip-It Ltd.
Case Number:	1:2015cv02172
Filed:	March 23, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 3, 2020	Filing 163 ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the parties are to file th eir settlement agreement under seal by January 17, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court "So Orders" the parties' settlement agreement and that this Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the parties' settlement agreement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/3/2020) (kv)
June 26, 2019	Filing 124 OPINION AND ORDER re: 98 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment (Notice of Motion). filed by Zip-It Ltd. For the foregoing reasons, ZIP-IT's motion is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on July 18, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 98. It is SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 7/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/26/2019) (kv)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 3, 2020

Filing 163 ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the parties are to file th eir settlement agreement under seal by January 17, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court "So Orders" the parties' settlement agreement and that this Court retains jurisdiction for purposes of enforcing the parties' settlement agreement. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/3/2020) (kv)

June 26, 2019

Filing 124 OPINION AND ORDER re: 98 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment (Notice of Motion). filed by Zip-It Ltd. For the foregoing reasons, ZIP-IT's motion is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear for a status conference on July 18, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 98. It is SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 7/18/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/26/2019) (kv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bam Bags, LLC v. Zip-It Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bam Bags, LLC
Represented By:	Joel Benjamin Rothman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Zip-It Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?