Neal v. Wilson et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Neal
Defendant: Wilson, Rodriguez, Maldonado, Camhi, John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3), John Doe (4), John Doe (5), John Doe (6), Scott M. Stringer, Sargeant Bones, Detective 3 Scollo and Detective 3 Marrero
Case Number: 1:2015cv02822
Filed: April 2, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 128 SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and Add Party to Suit addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Thomas P Higgins dated Dec. 1, 2017 filed by Christopher Neal. Accordingly, Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Third Amended Complaint within thirty days adding Sergeant Kaiser as a Defendant. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 1/5/2018) (anc)
September 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 120 OPINION & ORDER re: 93 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Angel Bones, R. Wilson, Juan Rodriguez, Baudilo Garciarivas, Jose Marrero, David Camhi, Coty Green, Osvaldo Maldonado. The Court grants summary judgment to Defendants wi th respect to all claims arising out of the August 20 arrest and with respect to the false arrest and malicious prosecution claims arising out of the November 23 arrest. There are, however, genuine issues of material fact with respect to Plaintiff 's excessive force claims against Lieutenant Camhi and Officer Wilson and with respect to his failure to intervene claims against all of the officers who were present during the November 23 arrest. Accordingly, summary judgment on those claim s is denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's failure to intervene claims against Officers Rodriguez, Maldonado, Green, Garciarivas, and Wilson, Sergeant Bones, and Lieutenant Camhi, who are the named Def endants who Plaintiff claims were present when the alleged constitutional violations took place. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of Court is respectfully dire cted to terminate Detectives Jose Marrero and John Scollo from the case and close Docket Number 93. The Court will hold a telephone conference on October 6, 2017 at 11:30 a.m. Defendants' counsel is directed to make the arrangements necessary f or Plaintiff to participate, and as further set forth herein. (Jose Marrero (Shield No. 3452) and John Scollo (Shield No. 5391) terminated.) (Telephone Conference set for 10/6/2017 at 11:30 AM before Judge Ronnie Abrams.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/15/2017) (ras)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Allowing Neal to file his proposed third amended complaint would be futile because it would be barred by the statute of limitations as to the newly-named defendants. Accordingly, Neal's request to file a third amended complaint is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 3/09/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neal v. Wilson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Neal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maldonado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Camhi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (4)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (5)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe (6)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott M. Stringer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sargeant Bones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective 3 Scollo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective 3 Marrero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?