Smith v. New York State Department of Correctional Services et al
Plaintiff: William D. Smith
Defendant: New York State Department of Correctional Services, Robert Cunningham, Holloran and Chalk
Case Number: 1:2015cv03455
Filed: April 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Sullivan
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 139 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 138 Memorandum & Opinion in favor of Chalk, Hearing Officer Woodbourn Correctional Facility, Holloran, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Robert Cunningham against William D. Smith. It is hereby ORDE RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated November 30, 2022, the Court has GRANTED Defendants' motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety without leave to replead; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 12/1/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 138 OPINION & ORDER re: 134 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Holloran, Robert Cunningham, Chalk. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No 134) and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Second Amende d Complaint in its entirety without leave to replead. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 134, to enter judgment accordingly, and to close the case. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order to pro se Plaintiff at his address on the docket. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 11/30/2022) (ate) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER denying without prejudice to renew 126 Application for the Court to Request Counsel. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED, without prejudice to renew at a later date. The Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 126, mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff, and show proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/31/2021) (rj) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
May 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 101 OPINION & ORDER re: 81 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by William D. Smith, 83 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Holloran, Robert Cunningham, Chalk. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Part ial Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. A pre-trial status conference is scheduled on May 31, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. to discuss the remaining claims. Defendants' counsel is to appear in person and Plaintiff shall appear by telephone. Defendants' counsel is directed to make the necessary arrangements with the appropriate facility for Plaintiff to be available by telephone. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to termi nate the motions at ECF Nos. 81 & 83. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this Opinion to Plaintiff at the address below and show proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Pretrial Conference set for 5/31/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Nelson Stephen Roman.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/21/2018) (anc) Modified on 5/21/2018 (anc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. New York State Department of Correctional Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York State Department of Correctional Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Holloran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chalk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?