Brodsky v. Carter

Brodsky v. Carter

Plaintiff:	Meryl Brodsky
Defendant:	Zachary W. Carter
Case Number:	1:2015cv03469
Filed:	May 4, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	George B. Daniels
Presiding Judge:	Debra C. Freeman
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 28, 2016	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Adopting 20 Report and Recommendations., Finally, Brodsky objects to the Report's recommendation that this Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs' state and local-law claim s. (Plaintiffs' Objections at 7-8.) Declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over solely state and local-law claims is particularly appropriate here where Brodsky has already litigated related claims in state court. This Court agrees with the Report's recommendation, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state and local-law claims. (Report at 28-30.) This Court agrees with the Report's recommendation to dismiss this case in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/28/2016) (ama)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 28, 2016

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Adopting 20 Report and Recommendations., Finally, Brodsky objects to the Report's recommendation that this Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Plaintiffs' state and local-law claim s. (Plaintiffs' Objections at 7-8.) Declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over solely state and local-law claims is particularly appropriate here where Brodsky has already litigated related claims in state court. This Court agrees with the Report's recommendation, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state and local-law claims. (Report at 28-30.) This Court agrees with the Report's recommendation to dismiss this case in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/28/2016) (ama)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brodsky v. Carter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meryl Brodsky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary W. Carter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?