Asmah v. US Consulate Accra Ghana et al
| Thomas Asmah |
| US Consulate Accra Ghana, National Visa Center, United States Department of State, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2015cv03742 |
| May 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and/or for failure to state a claim filed by National Visa Center, US Consulate Accra Ghana, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States D epartment of State, United States Department of Homeland Security. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. To the extent that Asmah wishes to amend the Complaint to name individual federal officials, Asmah is grant ed leave to amend. If Asmah chooses to file an amended Complaint, he must do so on or before June 23, 2016. Asmah may direct any questions about this Order to the Court's Pro Se Office at (212) 805-0175.The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 23. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/23/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
