Mao et al v. Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC et al
Plaintiff: Lin Wai Mao and Chin Chiu
Defendant: Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC, Sands Bethworks Retail LLC, Lucky 9 Enterprise, Inc., John Doe 001-100 Corporations, Jason Chen and David Wong
Case Number: 1:2015cv06252
Filed: August 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Sands Defendants' motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against the Sands Defendants are dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Sands Defendants are not the only Def endants in this case, however, and the Non-Moving Defendants (who have been identified) appear to be in default. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint with the Court on August 10, 2015. (Docket No. 1). The Non-Moving Defendants were served with the Compla int, and proof of service was filed with the Court. (Docket Nos. 15, 24, 25). To date, the Non-Moving Defendants have neither answered the Complaint, nor otherwise appeared in this action. In light of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that any moti on for default judgment shall be filed, in accordance with the Courts Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases (see http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Furman), no later than two weeks from the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The remainin g Defendants shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment no later than one week after that. If a motion for default judgment is filed, it is further ORDERED that the Non-Moving Defendants show cause before this Court, Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York, on June 9, 2016, at 3:00 p.m., why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against them. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs serve the Non-Moving Defendant s via overnight courier with (1) a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and (2) a copy of the motion for default judgment and all supporting papers within one day of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order and the date of the motion, respe ctively, and promptly file proof of such service on the docket. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the Sands Defendants as Defendants in this case, and to terminate Docket No. 18. So ordered. re: 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Juris diction filed by Sands Bethworks Retail LLC, Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC. (Show Cause Hearing set for 6/9/2016 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 1105, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Jesse M. Furman.), Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC and Sands Bethworks Retail LLC terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/28/2016) (rjm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mao et al v. Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lin Wai Mao
Represented By: John Troy
Represented By: John Troy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chin Chiu
Represented By: John Troy
Represented By: John Troy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sands Bethworks Retail LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucky 9 Enterprise, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe 001-100 Corporations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?