Kucher v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. et al
| Riad Kucher, Amanul Islam Boby and Haroon Mojumder |
| Domino's Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza, LLC, Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC, Cookston Enterprises, Inc., Mumbuh Style Pizza, Inc., Hat Trick Pizza, Inc., Sestwon Pizza, LLC, 117 Mineola Ave., LLC, 1872A Bellmore Ave., LLC, 1017 Jericho Tpke LLC, 3489 Riverhead Pizza, LLC, 3469 Mastic Pizza, LLC, 3683 Washington Heights Pizza, LLC, 3456 Hamilton Heights Pizza, LLC, 3342 New Windsor Pizza, LLC, 3361 Monroe Pizza, LLC, 3352 Mount Kisco Pizza, LLC, 3441 Ossining Pizza, LLC, 3488 Cortland Manor Pizza, LLC, 3616 West Village Pizza, LLC, 3694 Lower East Side Pizza, LLC, 3551 Yonkers Pizza, LLC, Team Stamford, LLC, Team East Hartford, LLC, Rolling in the Dough, LLC, Customers First of Connecticut, LLC, AAR, LLC, MIRC, LLC, AMS Pizza, LLC, Lucky 13, Inc., AC Pizza, Inc., Doe Corporations and Robert Cookston |
| 1:2016cv02492 |
| April 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
505
OPINION AND ORDER re: (432 in 1:16-cv-02492-AJN-KNF) MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Domino's Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC, Domino's Pizza, LLC, (457 in 1:16-cv-02492-AJN-KNF, 457 in 1:16-cv-02 492-AJN-KNF) MOTION to Enforce Judgment re: (172) Judgment,, . MOTION to Compel Arbitration . filed by Domino's Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC, Domino's Pizza, LLC, (460 in 1:16-cv-02492-AJ N-KNF) MOTION to Enforce Judgment re: (172) Judgment,, . filed by 3694 Lower East Side Pizza, LLC, 3683 Washington Heights Pizza, LLC, 3616 West Village Pizza, LLC, 3551 Yonkers Pizza, LLC, 3489 Riverhead Pizza, LLC, 3488 Cortland Manor Pizza, LLC, 3469 Mastic Pizza, LLC, 3456 Hamilton Heights Pizza, LLC, 3441 Ossining Pizza, LLC, 3361 Monroe Pizza, LLC, 3352 Mount Kisco Pizza, LLC, 3342 New Windsor Pizza, LLC, 1872A Bellmore Ave., LLC, 1017 Jericho Tp ke LLC, 117 Mineola Ave., LLC, Team Stamford, LLC, AAR, LLC, Mumbuh Style Pizza, Inc., Sestwon Pizza, LLC, Cookston Enterprises, Inc., AC Pizza, Inc., Rolling in the Dough, LLC, Lucky 13, Inc., Robert Cookston, Hat Trick Pizza, I nc. The Domino's Defendants' motion for summary judgment in this consolidated action is GRANTED. In addition, the Cookston Defendants' Motion to Enforce Rule 68 Offer of Judgment and the Domino's Defendants' Motion to Enfo rce Rule 68 Offer of Judgment and to Compel Arbitration in Kucher are DENIED, with leave to refile no later than two weeks from the date of this Order. This resolves Docket Nos. 432, 457 and 460, and Docket No. 135 in the member case 16-cv-6 274. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the cases as to the Domino's Defendants. In addition, the parties in the three member cases shall each file a letter by no later than October 15, 2018 providing the Court with their views as to whether the cases should remain consolidated. SO ORDERED., (Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC, Domino's Pizza LLC, Domino's Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza, LLC, Domino's Pizz a, LLC, Dominos Pizza, Inc., Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC and Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC terminated.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/30/18) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:16-cv-02492-AJN-KNF, 1:16-cv-06274-AJN, 1:18-cv-00846-AJN (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
