Windstream Services LLC v. BMG Rights Management (U.S.) LLC, et al
| Windstream Services LLC |
| BMG Rights Management (U.S.) LLC and Rightscorp, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv05015 |
| June 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Analisa Torres |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 41 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by BMG Rights Management (U.S.) LLC, Rightscorp, Inc., 34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Declaratory Judgment Complaint. filed by BMG Rights Management (U.S.) LLC, Rightscorp, Inc. Plaintiff Windstream Services, LLC ("Windstream"), an internet service provider ("ISP"), brings this action against Defendants BMG Rights Management (US) LLC ("BMG"), a copyright holder, and Rightscorp Inc. ("Rightscorp"), BMG's copyright enforcement agent, seeking declaratory judgment regarding copyright noninfiingement and damages for intentional interference with contractual relations. Defendants move to dismiss f or lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons set forth above, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF Nos. 34 and 41 and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 4/17/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
