Doe v. United States
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: United States
Case Number: 1:2016cv07256
Filed: September 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER: The parties are directed to submit their motions for summary judgment by October 29, 2021. Responses are due on November 29, 2021. Any replies are due on December 17, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/13/2021) ( Motions due by 10/29/2021., Responses due by 11/29/2021, Replies due by 12/17/2021.) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ks)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER terminating 175 Letter Motion to Seal; granting 176 Letter Motion for Conference re: 175 LETTER MOTION to Seal , on a Provisional Basis, Certain Information Designated Confidential Under the Protective Orders addressed to J udge John G. Koeltl from Charles S. Jacob dated September 7, 2021. A pre-motion conference will be held on Monday, September 13, 2021, at 12:30pm. Dial-in: (888) 363-4749 access code 8140049. The Clerk shall close entries 176 and 177 as letter motions. SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 9/13/2021 at 12:30 PM before Judge John G. Koeltl.). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/7/2021) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (mml)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER: The Court has received a letter dated March 14, 2021 from the pro se plaintiff in this case. The letter encloses certain documents that he wishes to have filed under seal. The Court will docket the letter as an attachment to this order, but will not file the documents submitted at this time, under seal or otherwise. While plaintiff reports that the documents are "material to the issues of the case and may be determinative of issues on summary judgment," there is no motion for summary judgment pending at this time. If such a motion is eventually made, consistent with Judge Koeltl's individual rules, and plaintiff wishes to include these documents as part of the summary judgment papers, he may apply to the Court at that time to file the documents under seal at that time. The Court will accordingly return these documents to plaintiff by mail at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 3/26/2021) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER. The Court is amenable to maintaining the discovery stay and proceeding with a settlement conference this fall, although it is concerned that it may be premature if, as the Government suggests in its letter, "[f]urther discovery may also i nform the Government's ultimate settlement position." The Court, therefore, will maintain the discovery stay and schedule a settlement conference in October 2020 (A separate order to that effect will be issued with additional details about the settlement conference). However, the Court does not want to hold a settlement conference in October only to find that the parties need additional information before they can solidify their respective positions on settlement. Accordingly, no later than 14 days before the conference, the parties are directed to file on the docket a letter reconfirming their desire to proceed with the conference because they believe, with the Court's assistance, there may be a realistic chance of settlemen t. At that point, plaintiff will be required to have made a settlement demand (if he had not done so already), and the Government will be better able to evaluate its own settlement position. What the Court wants to avoid is either plaintiff or the Go vernment coming to the settlement conference and reporting to the Court that additional information through discovery is needed before meaningful settlement discussions may take place. If that were the case, then the settlement conference would need to be adjourned, the stay lifted, and discovery proceed before a settlement conference were to take place. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 7/28/2020) (rjm)
March 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 137 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 132 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 129 Memorandum & Opinion,. filed by Joshua Rosner. The movant's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close docket number 132. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/18/19) (yv)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 75 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 74 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Joshua Rosner. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arg uments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, the movant's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to close docket number 75. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/14/2018) (anc)
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 74 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 43 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. filed by Joshua Rosner, 37 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. filed by Joshua Rosner, 58 LETTER MOTION for Conference re discovery dispute addre ssed to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott from Lauren Almquist Lively dated February 16, 2018. filed by United States. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. As explained above, the plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment is denied. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/12/18) (yv)
March 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The court has considered all of the objections and all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. All of the objections are overruled. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/13/2018) (rjm)
June 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The remaining arguments of the parties are either moot or without merit. For the reasons outlined above, the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously is denied. However, any references to the plaintiff's m edical information or the identity of the plaintiff's clients may be kept under seal, and any Court submissions referring to this information should be redacted. Any additional requests to seal or redact certain submissions will be addressed by the Court as they arise. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: denying 3 MOTION TO REQUEST ANONYMOUS DESIGNATION IN PLACE OF PLAINTIFF'S NAME, filed by John Doe. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/31/2017) (ap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?