Jones v. City Of New York et al
Matthew Jones |
City Of New York, Adam Muniz, Michael Vaccaro, John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 |
1:2016cv08080 |
October 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
John G. Koeltl |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 186 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not otherwise addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the objections to the Report are overruled and the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to an award of $395,835.54 in attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 178 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/26/2022) (ks) |
Filing 175 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 141 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Docket Entry No. 141, is granted and the following attorney's fees and costs are found to be reasonable: (As set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 8/24/2021) (va) |
Filing 170 ORDER denying 138 Motion for New Trial; denying 138 Motion to Set Aside Verdict. For reasons stated on the record at the teleconference held today, the motion for new trial or remittitur pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ECF No. 138, is denied. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 138. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/3/2021) (ks) |
Filing 126 ORDER: The judgment in this case having been reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the mandate having been issued on July 17, 2017, and the case having been remanded to this Court for further proceedings consistent with the opi nion of the Court of Appeals, the parties are directed to submit a proposed judgment to this Court by July 24, 2020. If the parties are unable to agree upon a judgment, the plaintiff may submit a proposed judgment by July 27, 2020, with any supporting explanation, and the defendants may submit a counter- proposed judgment by July 29, 2020, with any supporting explanation. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/18/2020) (nb) |
Filing 109 OPINION AND ORDER re: 94 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law In Favor of Lt. Treubig, Made Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, Based Upon Qualified Immunity. filed by Adam Muniz, Undercover Officer #349, Michael Vaccaro, Lieutenant Christopher Treubig. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, Lt. Treubig's motion for judgment as a matter of law on qualified immunity grounds is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/21/18) (yv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.