Jones v. City Of New York et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones
Defendant: City Of New York, Adam Muniz, Michael Vaccaro, John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Case Number: 1:2016cv08080
Filed: October 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 186 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not otherwise addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the objections to the Report are overruled and the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to an award of $395,835.54 in attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 178 and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/26/2022) (ks)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 175 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 141 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, Docket Entry No. 141, is granted and the following attorney's fees and costs are found to be reasonable: (As set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 8/24/2021) (va)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER denying 138 Motion for New Trial; denying 138 Motion to Set Aside Verdict. For reasons stated on the record at the teleconference held today, the motion for new trial or remittitur pursuant to Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ECF No. 138, is denied. The Clerk is directed to close ECF No. 138. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/3/2021) (ks)
July 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER: The judgment in this case having been reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the mandate having been issued on July 17, 2017, and the case having been remanded to this Court for further proceedings consistent with the opi nion of the Court of Appeals, the parties are directed to submit a proposed judgment to this Court by July 24, 2020. If the parties are unable to agree upon a judgment, the plaintiff may submit a proposed judgment by July 27, 2020, with any supporting explanation, and the defendants may submit a counter- proposed judgment by July 29, 2020, with any supporting explanation. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 7/18/2020) (nb)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 109 OPINION AND ORDER re: 94 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law In Favor of Lt. Treubig, Made Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, Based Upon Qualified Immunity. filed by Adam Muniz, Undercover Officer #349, Michael Vaccaro, Lieutenant Christopher Treubig. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above, Lt. Treubig's motion for judgment as a matter of law on qualified immunity grounds is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/21/18) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. City Of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones
Represented By: Alexis Padilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Muniz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Vaccaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?