Daniels v. The City Of New York et al.
Plaintiff: |
Kevin Daniels |
Defendant: |
The City Of New York, Saul A. Delacruz and Jesus A. Munet |
Case Number: |
1:2016cv09080 |
Filed: |
November 22, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
New York |
Presiding Judge: |
Alison J. Nathan |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 13, 2018 |
Filing
104
OPINION & ORDER re: 82 FIRST MOTION to Preclude Defendants' Expert. filed by Kevin Daniels. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. This resolves Docket Number 82. Within two weeks of the date of this Ord er, the parties shall confer regarding settlement and file a status letter with the Court indicating whether they seek a referral to either the Magistrate Judge or the Court-annexed Mediation Program. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/13/18) (yv)
|
September 27, 2018 |
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City Of New York, Jesus A. Munet, Saul A. Delacruz, 58 FIRST MOTION in Limine by the Plaintiff filed by Kevin Daniels. The Def endants' motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Plaintiffs unreasonable seizure claim and denied as to Plaintiff's negligence claim. This resolves docket number 59. A scheduling conference in this matter will be set un der separate order. In light of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, it appears that some of the parties' motions in limine may be moot. As a result, the Court will deny the parties' motions in limine for administrative purposes only. The parties shall refile only motions in limine that are relevant to the Plaintiffs remaining claims. These motions in limine shall be filed within two weeks of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Responses to motions in limine will be due two weeks after the motions in limine are filed. This resolves docket numbers 57 and 58. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/27/2018) (mro)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?