United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu v. Grifols USA, LLC, et al
| 1:2017cv02226 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 92 Order on Motion for Judgment in favor of Grifols Biologicals, LLC, Grifols Shared Services North America, Inc., Grifols USA, LLC, Grifols, S.A. against United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu. It is here by ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated January 4, 2022, the claims asserted in Relators complaint are dismissed with prejudice and judgment is entered for Defendants. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 1/5/2022) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting 90 Motion for Judgment. Accordingly, the Court orders that the claims asserted in Relators complaint be dismissed with prejudice and that the Clerk of Court enter judgment for Defendants. The Clerk of Court is also directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 90. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/4/2022) (jca) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 75 MOTION to Strike Document No. 71 . filed by United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu.Relator has not presented any viable justification to strike Exhibit A from the record of this case.. Accordingly, Relator's Motion to Strike is DENIED.However, the Court will consider the arguments presented in Relator's Motion to Strike in the correct procedural contextnamely, to evaluate whether the Court should consider Exhibit A in de ciding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Court will address those arguments in its forthcoming decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court is instructed to terminate the motion at Dkt. No. 76. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/26/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing
70
STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material...SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/4/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER. The Court's previous error mistakenly noted that the parties' joint letter and proposed case management plan referenced in the Court's April 30, 2020 order are due no later than June 10, 2020. The joint letter and proposed case management plan is instead due no later than July 10, 2020. Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on all Defendants and to retain proof of service. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 5/22/2020) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu v. Grifols USA, LLC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
