American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Department of Defense et al
American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation |
Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Justice and Department of State |
1:2017cv03391 |
May 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Paul A. Engelmayer |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 160 ORDER: On November 24, 2021, the Court directed the parties to file a joint status update by January 18, 2022, regarding the progress of the parties' negotiations. To date, no such update has been filed. The Court directs the parties to file such update by February 3, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/27/2022) (tg) |
Filing 136 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the ACLU's motion for summary judgment is denied except as to CENTCOM/027-030 and JS/057-058, and the Government's motion for summary judgment is granted except as to CENTCOM/027-030 and JS/057-0 58. The Government is directed to provide those two records for secure in camera review by February 13, 2020. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at dockets 111 and 117. SO ORDERED.. Motions terminated: [117 ] CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Department of State and Department of Defense, filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Department of Defense, Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/27/2020) (va) |
Filing 67 OPINION & ORDER re: 35 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Central Intelligence Agenc y. For the foregoing reasons, the CIA's motion for summary judgment is denied in full and the ACLU's motion for summary judgment is denied except as to FOIA request two, as to which it is granted. The CIA is directed to submit an y new Glomar response with respect to requests one, three, four and five within two weeks of this order. Upon submission of such a response, the Court will entertain a joint proposal from counsel as to a prompt schedule for briefing the validit y of such a response. If no such response is submitted, the CIA is directed promptly to produce responsive records and/or a Vaughn index to plaintiffs, as have the other three defendants. As to request two, the CIA is directed forthwith to c ollect records responsive to this request and to be prepared, after the status of the other four requests has been resolved, promptly to produce to the ACLU responsive materials and/or a Vaughn Index chronicling withheld materials. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions pending at Dkts. 35 and 42. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/27/2018) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.