American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Department of Defense et al
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation
Defendant: Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Justice and Department of State
Case Number: 1:2017cv03391
Filed: May 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER: On November 24, 2021, the Court directed the parties to file a joint status update by January 18, 2022, regarding the progress of the parties' negotiations. To date, no such update has been filed. The Court directs the parties to file such update by February 3, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/27/2022) (tg)
January 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 136 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the ACLU's motion for summary judgment is denied except as to CENTCOM/027-030 and JS/057-058, and the Government's motion for summary judgment is granted except as to CENTCOM/027-030 and JS/057-0 58. The Government is directed to provide those two records for secure in camera review by February 13, 2020. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at dockets 111 and 117. SO ORDERED.. Motions terminated: [117 ] CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Department of State and Department of Defense, filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Department of Defense, Department of State, Central Intelligence Agency. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/27/2020) (va)
June 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 67 OPINION & ORDER re: 35 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Central Intelligence Agenc y. For the foregoing reasons, the CIA's motion for summary judgment is denied in full and the ACLU's motion for summary judgment is denied except as to FOIA request two, as to which it is granted. The CIA is directed to submit an y new Glomar response with respect to requests one, three, four and five within two weeks of this order. Upon submission of such a response, the Court will entertain a joint proposal from counsel as to a prompt schedule for briefing the validit y of such a response. If no such response is submitted, the CIA is directed promptly to produce responsive records and/or a Vaughn index to plaintiffs, as have the other three defendants. As to request two, the CIA is directed forthwith to c ollect records responsive to this request and to be prepared, after the status of the other four requests has been resolved, promptly to produce to the ACLU responsive materials and/or a Vaughn Index chronicling withheld materials. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions pending at Dkts. 35 and 42. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/27/2018) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Department of Defense et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union
Represented By: Anna Natalia Diakun
Represented By: Brett Max Kaufman
Represented By: Hina Shamsi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation
Represented By: Anna Natalia Diakun
Represented By: Brett Max Kaufman
Represented By: Hina Shamsi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Defense
Represented By: Elizabeth Tulis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Represented By: Elizabeth Tulis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Represented By: Elizabeth Tulis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of State
Represented By: Elizabeth Tulis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?