Yi Feng Leather International LTD v. Tribeca Design Showroom, LLC
Yi Feng Leather International LTD |
Tribeca Design Showroom, LLC |
1:2017cv05195 |
July 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Alison J. Nathan |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 OPINION AND ORDER re: 43 SECOND MOTION for Default Judgment as to All Defendants. filed by Yi Feng Leather International LTD. For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Tribe ca. Plaintiff is awarded $404,207.99 or the Hong Kong equivalent in damages plus interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The Court DENIES as moot Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against the Grysons. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this matter and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/30/2019) (kv) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for the entry of default judgment. For the following reasons, the Court declines to grant the motion, but will accept further briefing on the question of complete diversity. (As further set forth in this Order.) Accordingly, this Court cannot exercise alienage diversity jurisdiction in this action unless it is satisfied that none of the Defendants are citizens of foreign states. Neither the allegations in Plaintiffs& #039; amended complaint, nor any other materials in this action, permit the Court to reach this conclusion. Because district courts have "authority to consider questions of jurisdiction on the basis of affidavits as well as the pleadings," ; the Court will permit Plaintiff 14 days from the date of this order to submit a memorandum and any appropriate affidavits that more specifically demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that alienage diversity jurisdiction exists in this action. Additionally, to the extent Plaintiff seeks default judgment on its corporate fraud claim, Plaintiff's memorandum shall "identify legal authority... supporting entry of judgment on the basis of' that claim, Dkt. No. 42 (em phasis added), addressing whether Plaintiff has established a prima facie case for recovery. Plaintiff shall serve this order and any responsive filings on the Defendants in this action, and file proof of their service on the public docket. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/3/2018) (cf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Yi Feng Leather International LTD v. Tribeca Design Showroom, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Yi Feng Leather International LTD | |
Represented By: | Paul Berne Sherr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tribeca Design Showroom, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.