iSentium, LLC v. Bloomberg Finance L.P. et al
iSentium, LLC |
Bloomberg Finance L.P., Bloomberg L.P. and Bloomberg Inc. |
1:2017cv07601 |
October 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
P. Kevin Castel |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 59 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of Bloomberg Finance L.P., Bloomberg Inc., Bloomberg L.P. against iSentium, LLC. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated January 16, 2020, Bloomberg's motion for summary judgment is granted; judgment is entered for Defendants. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 01/17/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt) |
Filing 59 OPINION AND ORDER re: 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment: Bloomberg's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Docket # 49.) The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion and to enter judgment for the defendants. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 1/16/2020) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER: Bloomberg's motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED as to iSentium's claims of promissory estoppel and unjust enrichment, and DENIED as to its claims for the misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract. There will be a pretrial conference in this case on December 14, 2018 at 12 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Pretrial Conference set for 12/14/2018 at 12:00 PM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/16/2018) (rro) |
Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. filed by Bloomberg Inc., Bloomberg Finance L.P., Bloomberg L.P. Bloombergs motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED as to iSentiums claim of patent infringe ment. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 22.) No later than November 13, 2018, the parties may submit letter-briefs setting forth their views as to whether the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/29/2018) (jca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.