Wilson-Phillips et al v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
Chamelle Wilson-Phillips and Melissa Gissentanner |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Metro-North Commuter Railroad |
1:2018cv00417 |
January 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Valerie E. Caproni |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For all the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that one of the Plaintiffs must be severed from this case, pursuant to Rule 21. No later than November 21, 2018, one of the Plaintiffs must voluntarily dismiss all of her cl aims from this action (without prejudice to refiling in a separate action). If neither Plaintiff does so, the Court will, in its discretion, choose one Plaintiff to dismiss from this action. Defendants and the remaining Plaintiff must appear for a co nference with this Court on December 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 443 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse. No later than November 29, 2018, Defendants and the remaining Plaintiff must submit a joint proposed case management plan. SO ORDERED.., ( Status Conference set for 12/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 443, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Valerie E. Caproni.) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 11/14/2018) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.