Shak v. Krum

Shak v. Krum

Plaintiff:	Beth Shak
Defendant:	Mark Jay Krum
Case Number:	1:2018cv01650
Filed:	February 22, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2018	Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants Counterclaims is GRANTED as to all Counterclaims except the quantum meruit counterclaim. Should Defendant wish to replead, he shall file within 21 days a re d-lined version of a proposed amended answer and counterclaims, showing changes from the current Answer and Counterclaims, together with a letter not to exceed three pages explaining how the legal deficiencies identified in this Opinion have been cured, and stating how the repleaded counterclaims would augment the damages to which he may be entitled under the surviving quantum meruit counterclaim. No pre-motion conference is necessary. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/6/2018) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2018

Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants Counterclaims is GRANTED as to all Counterclaims except the quantum meruit counterclaim. Should Defendant wish to replead, he shall file within 21 days a re d-lined version of a proposed amended answer and counterclaims, showing changes from the current Answer and Counterclaims, together with a letter not to exceed three pages explaining how the legal deficiencies identified in this Opinion have been cured, and stating how the repleaded counterclaims would augment the damages to which he may be entitled under the surviving quantum meruit counterclaim. No pre-motion conference is necessary. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 11/6/2018) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shak v. Krum
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beth Shak
Represented By:	Robert L Ebby
Represented By:	Ronald Paltin Schiller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Jay Krum
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?