Jane Doe v. Solera Capital LLC et al
| Jane Doe |
| Solera Capital LLC and Molly Ashby |
| 1:2018cv01769 |
| February 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 139 Motion to Seal. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion. Doc. 139. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/30/2021) (mml)
|
|
Filing
138
OPINION & ORDER: The Revised Agreement otherwise represents a fair and reasonable settlement. See Fisher v. SD Prot. Inc., 948 F.3d 593, 600 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, the parties' request for approval of the revised FLSA Agreement is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/3/2021) (mro)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 Letter Motion to Seal; granting in part and denying in part 129 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. For the foregoing reasons, the parties' request to keep documents under seal is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to keep the parties' cover letter and Confidential Agreement under seal, Docs. 129 and 129-3, and to modify the viewing level of the fairness letter and t he FLSA Agreement, Docs. 129-1 and 129-2, such that the documents are viewable on the public docket. The parties' request for approval of the FLSA Agreement is DENIED without prejudice. The parties may proceed in one of the following way s: 1. File a revised letter and revised signed agreements addressing the concerns expressed in this Order by February 3, 2021; or 2. File a joint letter by February 3, 2021 that indicates the parties' intention to abandon sett lement and continue to trial, at which point the Court will set a date for a pre-trial conference. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the motions. Docs. 128 and 129. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/20/2021) (mro)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER terminating 124 Motion to Seal; terminating 125 Motion to Vacate. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED BY THE COURT that if this case is remanded to the District Court by the Court of Appeals, this Court will grant the parties' joint motio n pursuant to Rule 62.1 and proceed to vacate its March 31, 2019 Opinion and Order and related October 25, 2019 Opinion and Order. The parties' joint request to file their motion (Doc. 125) and accompanying memorandum of law (Doc. 126) under seal is hereby granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions. Docs. 124 and 125. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/18/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER denying as moot 108 Letter Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 110 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. In light of the parties' agreement on all issues raised in their letters of September 17, 2020, and September 24, 2020, the motions made therein are DENIED as moot. The Fourth Amended Civil Case Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order remains in effect. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 108 and 110. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/25/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
102
FOURTH AMENDED CIVIL CASE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER granting 101 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting 101 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. All parties do not consent to conducting all further proce edings before a Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This case is to be tried to a jury. Non-expert depositions shall be completed by September 30, 2020. (Deposition due by 10/30/2020., Discovery due by 10/30/2020.) (Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2020 at 03:30 PM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/29/2020) (kv)
|
|
Filing
97
SECOND AMENDED CIVIL CASE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER granting 95 Letter Motion for Discovery. All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The parties are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. This case is to be tried to a jury. Amended pleadings may be filed until March 23, 2020. Non-expert depositions shall be completed by April 24, 2020. Expert depositions shall be completed by May 29, 2020. ALL DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY MAY 29, 2020. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this case is the Hon. Katharine H. Parker. The next case management conference is scheduled for 6/3/20, at 3:30 PM. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/26/20) (yv)
|
|
Filing
81
OPINION AND ORDER re: 54 MOTION for Reconsideration . filed by Jane Doe. For the reasons set forth above, Doe's motion to reconsider this Court's order, dated March 31, 2019, denying her motion for a protective order t o continue to proceed anonymously is DENIED. That order shall remain in effect, and Plaintiff is directed to file her Third Amended Complaint under her legally changed name within seven days of the filing of this order. The parties are directed to ap pear for a status conference on November 22, 2019 at 4:00 PM. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 54. It is SO ORDERED. Status Conference set for 11/22/2019 at 04:00 PM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/23/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
51
OPINION AND ORDER re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims. filed by Jane Doe, 32 CROSS MOTION to Amend/Correct Pleading. filed by Solera Capital LLC, Molly Ashby, 27 MOTION for Protective Order To Continue To Proceed Under Pseudonym. filed by Jane Doe. For the reasons set forth above, Doe's motion for a protective order to continue to proceed anonymously is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to file a Third Amended Complaint to include her actual name by April 12, 2019. Doe's motion to dismiss counterclaims is GRANTED, and Defendants' cross-motion to amend their pleadings is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 23, 27, and 32. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 4/12/2019.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/31/2019) (kv) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
