Ryan v. Rock Group NY Corp. et al
| Robert Ryan |
| Rock Group NY Corp., Simranpal Singh and Prabhjit Singh |
| 1:2018cv02600 |
| March 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER: The Court has been informated that this case has settled. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs; provided, however, that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the parties may submit to the Court their own Stipulation of Settlement and Dismissal.1 Otherwise, within such time Plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the active calendar of this Court in the event that the settlement is not consummated. Upon such application for reinstatement, the parties shall continue to be subject to the Court's jurisdiction, the Court shall promptly reinstate the action to its active docket, and the parties shall be direct ed to appear before the Court, without the necessity of additional process, on a date within ten (10) days of the application, to schedule remaining pretrial proceedings and/or dispositive motions, as appropriate. This Order shall be deemed a fina l discontinuance of the action with prejudice in the event that Plaintiff has not requested restoration of the case to the active calendar within such 30-day period. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/26/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record during the January 2, 2020 conference, Defendants must complete its production with respect to categories (A), (B) and (C) as identified by Plaintiffs portion of the parties December 24, 2019 joint le tter, Dkt. No. 68, by January 15, 2020. In response to the evidence adduced by counsel for Plaintiff that Defendants have failed to produce all responsive materials, Defendants must also certify for the Court and its adversary that all of the emai ls identified by Plaintiff have been produced, as well as provide a complete explanation by affidavit from the individual who cloned Defendant Rock Group NY Corp.s server explaining any gaps identified by Plaintiff. (As further set forth in this order.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/2/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 54 MOTION for Sanctions Notice of Motion filed by Robert Ryan. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants must pay the reasonable direct costs and ex penses Plaintiff incurred chasing after all of the discovery he was owed after the October 30, 2018 conference-namely, the reasonable costs and expenses Plaintiff incurred in writing emails to his adversary and letters to the Court, participa ting in meet and confers and Court-ordered conferences, and in making this motion. Further, because Plaintiff has already taken depositions in connection with the underlying litigation, Defendants must also pay any reasonable attorneys' fees and costs associated with any renewed depositions necessary or appropriate in light of Defendants' post-deposition productions. Plaintiff is directed to submit a fee application documenting proof of his fees and expenses in bringing this motion within 30 days of this decision. Defendants may adduce any documentation regarding financial hardship that would hinder its ability to pay the Court's sanction as part of any opposition to the reasonableness of Pl aintiff's fees. Plaintiff may supplement this application at the close of discovery with fees and costs associated with any renewed depositions necessary given the Court's decision here. One final note: these are the first sanctio ns the Court has imposed in this case, but they may not be the last. If it becomes evident that Plaintiff must bear other direct costs and fees as a result of the same misconduct, or if additional steps are required to ensure Defendants' ; compliance with their discovery obligations, the Court will determine whether it is appropriate to impose additional sanctions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 54. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/16/2019) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
