Chicago Insurance Company v. General Reinsurance Corporation, et al
Case Number: 1:2018cv10450
Filed: October 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion to stay is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 53. SO ORDERED. Denying 53 LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 50 Memorandum & Opinion, addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Sean Thomas Keely dated 11/11/2019. Document filed by Chicago Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/14/2019) (rjm)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner's petition to compel arbitration and stay arbitration is DENIED, and Respondents' cross-petition to stay arbitration and for declaratory relief is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/21/2019) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chicago Insurance Company v. General Reinsurance Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?