Metso Minerals Canada, Inc. et al v. ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere Canada et al
Petitioner: Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. and Metso Minerals Canada, Inc.
Respondent: ArcelorMittal Canada Inc. and ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere Canada
Case Number: 1:2019cv03379
Filed: April 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 202
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Metso Corporation for Metso Minerals Canada, Inc.; Corporate Parent Metso USA, Inc. for Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.. Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc..(Chamberlain, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Chamberlain, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.. Related Document Number: #2 . (Chamberlain, John) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.
April 16, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Evan Jaffe in Support re: #2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration .. Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Chamberlain, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration . . Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.. (Chamberlain, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration . Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc..(Chamberlain, John)
April 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-16706690).Document filed by Metso Minerals Canada, Inc., Metso Minerals Industries, Inc..(Chamberlain, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Metso Minerals Canada, Inc. et al v. ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere Canada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Metso Minerals Industries, Inc.
Represented By: John Patrick Chamberlain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Metso Minerals Canada, Inc.
Represented By: John Patrick Chamberlain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ArcelorMittal Canada Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?