Wang v. Ren
| MING EN WANG |
| HAIYING REN, MICHAEL CHEN and MICHAEL REN |
| 1:2019cv05310 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Haiying Ren served on 7/30/2019, answer due 8/20/2019. Service was accepted by HAIYING REN a/k/a Michael Chen a/k/a Michael Ren. Document filed by Ming En Wang. (Troy, John)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John G. Koeltl: Initial Conference set for 9/5/2019 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 14A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge John G. Koeltl. (Fletcher, Donnie)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Aaron B. Schweitzer on behalf of Ming En Wang. (Schweitzer, Aaron)
|
|
Filing 6
RELATED CASE AFFIRMATION of John Troy re: that this action be filed as related to 17-cv-09582. Document filed by Ming En Wang.(Troy, John)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Haiying Ren. (dnh)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (dnh)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (dnh)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney John Troy. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Class Action code n (No Class Action Alleged). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Class Action code has been modified to y (Class Action Alleged). (dnh)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney John Troy. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: MING EN WANG ; HAIYING REN. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; alias party name was entered in all caps. (dnh)
|
|
Filing 4
CONSENT TO BECOME PARTY PLAINTIFF UNDER THE F.L.S.A. Document filed by MING EN WANG.(Troy, John)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to HAIYING REN a/k/a MICHAEL CHEN a/k/a MICHAEL REN, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by MING EN WANG. (Troy, John)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Troy, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against HAIYING REN. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-17027694)Document filed by MING EN WANG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Sue Form, #2 Exhibit Document Preservation Demand, #3 Exhibit Notice of Lien and Assignment, #4 Exhibit Notice that Retaliation is illegal under the FLSA and NYLL, #5 Exhibit Notice of Settlement under the Table is Prohibited)(Troy, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
