Hudson EFT, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
| Hudson EFT, LLC |
| Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| The Wavecrest Management Team, Ltd. |
| 1:2020cv08603 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ds |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. Document filed by Hudson EFT, LLC.(McAloon, Sean) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, The Wavecrest Management Team, Ltd..Document filed by Hudson EFT, LLC..(McAloon, Sean) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Corporate Parent Chubb Group Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Chubb US Holdings, Inc. for Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Document filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company..(Wilson, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Wilson, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme, County of New York. Case Number: 652080/2020. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-22151283).Document filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Wilson, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
