Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC v. Fleitas
Plaintiff: Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC
Defendant: Marcello Fleitas
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Fleitas Marcello
Case Number: 1:2021cv00992
Filed: February 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: P Kevin Castel
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Compliant, Summons, Commercial Arbitration Rules Demand for Arbitration, Jury Demand, Certification and Civil Cover Sheet served on MARCELLO FLEITAS on March 11, 2021. Service was accepted by John Doe. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC., AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Marcello Fleitas served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. Service was accepted by John Doe. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC..(Forino, Michael)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Marcello Fleitas. (sj)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Joseph Forino on behalf of Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC..(Forino, Michael)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MARCELLO FLEITAS, re: #3 Complaint. Document filed by Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC..(Papalia, Patrick)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Marcello Fleitas. Document filed by Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC..(Papalia, Patrick)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sj)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Michael Joseph Forino. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Marcello Fleitas. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party role was entered incorrectly. (sj)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael Joseph Forino. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $255,340,000; County code Queens. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $255,000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Michael Joseph Forino to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the pleading was not signed by filing attorney. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge P. Kevin Castel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Forino, Michael)
February 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against Fleitas Marcello. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23816818)Document filed by Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC..(Forino, Michael) Modified on 2/5/2021 (sj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC v. Fleitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Knowledge Tech LLC
Represented By: Michael Joseph Forino
Represented By: Patrick Papalia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Fleitas Marcello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marcello Fleitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?