Hope Organics LLC v. Preggo Leggings LLC
| Hope Organics LLC |
| Preggo Leggings LLC |
| 1:2021cv02416 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Vernon S Broderick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ANSWER to #16 Counterclaim. Document filed by Hope Organics LLC..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND., COUNTERCLAIM against Hope Organics LLC. Document filed by Preggo Leggings LLC..(Ghiam, Armin)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: granting #14 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 4/08/2021) (ama)
|
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Preggo Leggings LLC answer due 4/26/2021. (ama)
|
|
Filing 14
JOINT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time the parties respectfully request a 14-day extension of time for Defendant Preggo Leggings LLC to answer, move to dismiss, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint until April 26, 2021. addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from James Rosini dated April 6, 2021. Document filed by Preggo Leggings LLC..(Rosini, James)
|
|
Filing 13
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Preggo Leggings LLC..(Ghiam, Armin)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Armin Ghiam on behalf of Preggo Leggings LLC..(Ghiam, Armin)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sherli M. Furst on behalf of Preggo Leggings LLC..(Furst, Sherli)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James E. Rosini on behalf of Preggo Leggings LLC..(Rosini, James)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jessica Anne Rose on behalf of Hope Organics LLC..(Rose, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 8
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Preggo Leggings LLC served on 3/22/2021, answer due 4/12/2021. Service was accepted by Acacia Puckett. Document filed by Hope Organics LLC..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 7
AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(dnh)
|
|
Filing 6
AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for additional pleading submitted to court for review..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Preggo Leggings LLC..(dnh)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(dnh)
|
|
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (dnh)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (dnh)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT AO 120 FORM PATENT/TRADEMARK. Notice to Attorney Andrew J. Rossman to submit a completed AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark to court for review. Use the event type AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark - Notice of Submission by Attorney found under the event list Other Documents. (dnh)
|
|
Filing 4
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Hope Organics LLC..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Preggo Leggings LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Hope Organics LLC..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Preggo Leggings LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-24278168)Document filed by Hope Organics LLC..(Rossman, Andrew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hope Organics LLC v. Preggo Leggings LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hope Organics LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew J. Rossman |
| Represented By: | Jessica Anne Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Preggo Leggings LLC | |
| Represented By: | James E. Rosini |
| Represented By: | Sherli M. Furst |
| Represented By: | Armin Ghiam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
