Neske et al v. Banks et al
Plaintiff: Dorothy Neske and Christopher Neske
Defendant: David C Banks and New York City Department of Education
Case Number: 1:2022cv06946
Filed: August 15, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Jay Cullen dated September 2, 2022. Granted. SO ORDERED. David C Banks answer due 10/17/2022; New York City Department of Education answer due 10/17/2022. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 9/06/2022) (ama)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Jay Cullen dated September 2, 2022. Document filed by David C Banks, New York City Department of Education..(Cullen, James)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/19/2022) (kv)
August 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/19/2022) (kv)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Summons and Complaint, served. David C Banks served on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022; New York City Department of Education served on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022. Service was accepted by NYC Law Department. Service was made by EMAIL. Document filed by Dorothy Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.); Christopher Neske(Individually); Dorothy Neske(Individually); Christopher Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.)..(Rousseau, Ashleigh)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bellantoni, Rory)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to David C Banks, New York City Department of Education..(jgo)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Rory J. Bellantoni to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF was not signed by the attorney;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Rory J. Bellantoni. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps;. (jgo)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bellantoni, Rory) Modified on 8/16/2022 (jgo).
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to David C Banks, New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Christopher Neske(Individually), Christopher Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.), Dorothy Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.), Dorothy Neske(Individually)..(Bellantoni, Rory)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David C Banks, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26550947)Document filed by Dorothy Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.), Christopher Neske(Individually), Dorothy Neske(Individually), Christopher Neske(as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.N.). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FOFD, #2 Exhibit SRO Decision 22-020).(Bellantoni, Rory)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neske et al v. Banks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Neske
Represented By: Rory J. Bellantoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Neske
Represented By: Rory J. Bellantoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David C Banks
Represented By: James Faust Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Education
Represented By: James Faust Cullen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?