Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe
Case Number: 1:2024cv02512
Filed: April 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary Stein
Referring Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Discovery. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Spectrum to obtain the name and address of John Doe (the "Defendant") in accordance with the limitations stated in this Order. Plaintiff may not seek any other information about Defendant, including but not limited to Defendant's telephone number or email address. The subpoena shall attach a copy of the complaint in this matter and a copy of this Order, with the annexed "Notice to Subscriber." As further set forth by this Order. Plaintiff is further directed to file a status letter with the Court no later than June 30, 2024. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the open motion at Docket Number 12. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary Stein on 5/1/2024) (tg)
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #12 MOTION for Discovery Third Party Early Discovery. . Document filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Stalzer, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Williamson, #3 Affidavit Declaration Paige).(James, Jacqueline)
April 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Discovery Third Party Early Discovery. Document filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order).(James, Jacqueline)
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Letter Motion for Discovery. Application Granted. Plaintiff shall file its Motion by Friday, May 10, 2024. An Initial Case Management Conference will not be scheduled at this time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gary Stein on 4/10/24) (yv)
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is so redesignated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. (vba)
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF A REFERRAL TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The referral in the above entitled action has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gary Stein, for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn no longer referred to the case. Motions referred to Gary Stein. (vba)
April 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 5/10/2024. (yv)
April 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute ECF No. 9 and anticipated motion to serve third-party subpoena. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn. Motions referred to Sarah Netburn. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/9/2024) (mml)
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Discovery Third Party Early Discovery addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Jacqueline James dated April 8, 2024. Document filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC..(James, Jacqueline)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by June 3, 2024, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, on the docket. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by June 3, 2024, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/3/2024) (va)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/3/2024) (va)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by June 3, 2024, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. 2. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/3/2024) (va)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights..(jgo)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jacqueline Marie James. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: John Doe. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text contained a typographical error;. (jgo)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(James, Jacqueline)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. Document filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC..(James, Jacqueline)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(James, Jacqueline)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29166078)Document filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A).(James, Jacqueline)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Jacqueline Marie James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?