Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Commissioner of Social Security
||October 26, 2012
||New York Southern District Court
||White Plains Office
||Vincent L. Briccetti
||Paul E. Davison
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
|Cause of Action:
||42:405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 3, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 25 Report and Recommendations, 16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. Defendant& #039;s motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. Plaintiff's affirmation in opposition to defendant's motion is deemed to be a motion for judgment on the pleadings, and is GRANTED to the extent that the case is REMANDED for further ad ministrative proceedings consistent with the R&R, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. Plaintiff's motion for an order "foregoing further administrative proceedings and rule on the plaintiff's filing as a dispositive mot ion urging the Court to vacate and reverse" is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to enter Judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 12/3/2013) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (rj)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.