O'Loughlin v. USTA Player Development Incorporated et al
| Natalie O'Loughlin |
| USTA Player Development Incorporated and United States Tennis Association Incorporated |
| USTA Player Development Incorporated and United States Tennis Association Incorporated |
| Natalie O'Loughlin |
| 7:2014cv02194 |
| March 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert. filed by USTA Player Development Incorporated, United States Tennis Association Incorporated. Defendants' motion to exclude plaintiffs' expert&# 039;s testimony is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendants' motion to limit plaintiffs' damages claim is DENIED. All counsel are directed to appear for an in-person status co nference on November 3, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., at which time the Court will set a trial date and a schedule for pretrial submissions. By October 28, 2016, the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Order in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #56). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/28/2016) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
