Gilani v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al
| Asad Gilani |
| Hewlett-Packard Company, Marc Angrota and Tim Cowen |
| 1:2015cv05609 |
| July 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Unassigned |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER: Therefore, because pro se Plaintiff fails to argue how Magistrate Judge Smith's ruling striking his Fourth Amended Complaint from the record is clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court OVERRULES pro se Plaintiff's objec tions and UPHOLDS Magistrate Judge Smith's ruling. The Court further ORDERS the parties to confer and jointly file a written status update on the current status of this case on or before April 15, 2022. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff at his address on ECF and to show service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 4/6/2022) (ate)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION & ORDER re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss , for Judgment on the Pleadings, and for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Mark Angarola, Tim Cowan, Lisa Mincak, Hewlett-Packard Company. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's M otion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is granted insofar as it seeks dismissal of all claims against the Individual Defendants and dismissal of the state law claims against all Defendants. It is denied insofar as it seeks summary judgmen t on the issue of whether or not HP was Plaintiff's employer under the joint employer doctrine. In light of the fact that the parties were granted limited discovery on the issue of employment prior to briefing this motion, factual discovery o n Plaintiff's Title VII and ADEA claims is incomplete. The parties are therefore directed to confer and complete the attached Case Management Plan and submit it to Chambers on or before September 26, 2018. The Clerk of the Court is respectful ly requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 75. The Clerk of the Court is further respectfully directed to terminate Defendants Mark Angarola, Tim Cowan, and Lisa Mincak, as the SAC is dismissed as against them with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is also directed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Plaintiff at his address as listed on ECF. SO ORDERED. (Lisa Mincak, Mark Angarola and Tim Cowan terminated.) (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 9/12/2018) (anc) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
91
OPINION & ORDER re: 59 MOTION to Comply, filed by Asad Gilani. Despite Plaintiff's vague request, Global produced a copy of the contract requested. The contract appears to directly relate to Plaintiff's claims since it was purport edly executed during the relevant time frame referenced in the complaint. Plaintiff's sole objection to Defendants' response to the subpoena concerns Defendants' alleged resistance to his request to inspect the original document. Suc h request, however, lacks merit. Defendants represent the document provided to Plaintiff is a "true and correct copy" and after a "good faith" search of their records they are unable to produce the originally executed document. Accordingly, it is the Court's determination that Defendants have fully complied with Plaintiffs subpoena. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion seeking to compel nonparty Global to comply with a duly served subpoena is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at Doc. No. 59. This constitutes the Court's Order, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 9/22/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
