Asmodeo v. United States of America
Plaintiff: John Asmodeo
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 7:2020cv08330
Filed: October 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Vincent L Briccetti
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Mailed a copy of #3 Order to John Asmodeo, Reg. No. 71950-054 at Federal Correctional Institution, 33 1/2 Pembroke Road, Danbury, CT 06811-3099. (kh)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO AMEND: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Asmodeo, noting service on the docket. The Court construes Asmodeo's submission as a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255. By December 7, 2020, Asmodeo is directed to file an amended 2255 motion setting forth all his grounds for relief and any supporting facts for the grounds raised. An Amended Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 form is attached to this order. If Asmodeo does not respond to this order, the submission will remain designated as a 2255 motion, and the Court will direct the United States Attorney's Office to file an answer or other pleading in response to the motion. No answer shall be required at this time. The Court denies Asmodeo's request for counsel, under 18 U.S.C. 3006A, without prejudice to renewal at a later date. Because Asmodeo has not at this time made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 10/8/2020) (mml) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 12/7/2020. (mml)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 7:15-cr-00327-VB-1. Document filed by John Asmodeo. (sac)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (sac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asmodeo v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Asmodeo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?