Putnam At Tinton Falls, LLC., v. Annunziata
| 7:2020mc00281 |
| December 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Other |
| M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
OPINION & ORDER re: 13 CROSS MOTION to Reopen Case and Certification in opposition to Motion to Quash. filed by Putnam At Tinton Falls, LLC.,, 8 MOTION to Quash Subpoena . filed by Andrew I. Panken. For the foregoing r easons, Panken's motion to quash is DENIED without prejudice and Plaintiff's cross-motion to compel is GRANTED. Panken is to comply with the Subpoena with regards to any information or documents that do not contain privileged communicati ons between Panken and his client. If Panken wishes to assert attorney-client privilege over certain documents, Panken may do so by submitting such documents to the Court along with a log of such documents by January 14, 2022 for in camera review. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 8 & 13. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 12/15/2021) (ate)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Putnam At Tinton Falls, LLC., v. Annunziata | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
