Santiago v. Stamp et al
1:2005cv00032 |
January 14, 2005 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Hugh B. Scott |
William M. Skretny |
Both |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 48 Motion under Rules 59 and 60; DENYING as moot Plaintiff's 59 Motion for Assignment of Counsel; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 3/29/2011. (MEAL) |
Filing 46 DECISION AND ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in Defendant Correction Officer Stamp's favor and terminate him as a defendant in this case; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to file Plaintiff's late submission on the d ocket as a motion under Rules 59(e) and Rule 60(b)(1) and (6); DIRECTING Plaintiff to file any further submissions in support of his Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b)(1) and (6) motion on or before 5/18/2009; DIRECTING Defendants to respond on or before 6/28/2009; DIRECTING Plaintiff to reply by 7/9/2009; ADVISING Parties that Plaintiff's motion will be taken under advisement without oral argument. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 4/13/2009. (MEAL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Santiago v. Stamp et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.