P.P., Individually et al v. Evans-Brant Central School District
P.P., Individually and A.P., by his parent and next friend, P.P., |
Evans-Brant Central School District |
1:2009cv00922 |
October 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Erie |
William M. Skretny |
None |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Defendant's Motions and Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment in both S.M.'s and P.P.'s case (Docket Nos. 42, 59, 64 in 09-CV-922 and Docket Nos. 48, 60 in 09-CV-686); GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Plaint iffs' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52 in 09-CV-922 and Docket No. 55 in 09-CV-686); GRANTING Plaintiffs' Motions to Strike (Docket Nos. 60, 62 in 09-CV-922 and Docket No. 63 in 09-CV-686); AWARDING Plaintiff P.P. $85,265.31 and Plaintiff S.M. $99,624.29 in attorney fees and costs; DENYING Plaintiffs' request to supplement their fee application in both cases with additional hours; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in each case as specified; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to close cases numbered 09-CV-686 and 09-CV-922. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 7/31/2013. - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - (MEAL) |
Filing 12 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant's 8 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 1/16/2012. (MEAL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.