NL Industries, Inc. v. ACF Industries LLC et al
| NL Industries, Inc. |
| ACF Industries LLC, Halliburton Company and Exide Technologies |
| 1:2010cv00089 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 9607 Real Property Tort to Land |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
238
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER re 232 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff NL Industries to Produce Non-Privileged Third Party Documents filed by Gould Electronics, Inc., 231 Text Order, Sch eduling Order, Terminate Scheduling Order DeadlinesFIFTH AMENDED SCHEDULING/CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Please Note: This docket text may not contain the entire contents of the attached Order. It is your responsi bility to read the attached Order and download it for future reference. Direct any questions to the Chambers of the Judge who entered this Order.)Defendant Gould Electronics' Motion (Docket No. 232) is granted in part, denied in part.< P>Scheduling Order is amended as follows:As for liability phase, parties with affirmative proof Expert Witness ID due by 8/31/2015, responding parties Expert Witness ID due by 9/30/2015, Discovery completed by 10/30/2015.Liability phase Motions due by 1/28/2016.Motions terminated: 232 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff NL Industries to Produce Non-Privileged Third Party Documents filed by Gould Electronics, Inc.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 7/2/2015. (DRH)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER -Adopting in part and denying in part the Report and Recommendation 154 of Judge Hugh B. Scott as filed on February 15, 2012. Defendant Gould's motion to dismiss 81 is granted with respect to NL Industries' claims of indemnificati on and contribution (Counts III and IV), but is denied with respect to NL Industries CERCLA cost recovery and declaratory judgment claims (Counts I and II). The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 3/31/14. (LAS)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER re 118 MOTION for Reconsideration re 116 Order on Motion to Vacate, filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Halliburton Company, 81 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amen ded Complaint filed by Gould Electronics, Inc., 128 MOTION proposed Scheduling Order of plaintiffs for consideration in advance of 10/3/11 status/scheduling conference filed by NL Industries, Inc., 113 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by NL Industries, Inc.MOTION to Amend by plaintiff (Docket No. 113) is granted. Plaintiff is to serve and file this Fourth Amended Complaint within 10 days of entry of this Order.As of defendant Gould Electronics' MOTION to Dism iss (No. 81), defendant may supplement motion (as indicated in this Order) by 11/21/2011, Responses due by 12/2/2011, Replies due by 12/9/2011, Motion Hearing set for Tues., 12/13/2011, 11:00 AM, before Hon. Hugh B. Scott.Halliburton defend ants' motions to reconsider vacating Scheduling Order (Docket Nos. 122, 118) are denied.Motions terminated: 118 MOTION for Reconsideration re 116 Order on Motion to Vacate, filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Halliburton Company, 122 MOTION for Reconsideration re 116 Order on Motion to Vacate, filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Halliburton Company, 113 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by NL Industries, Inc., 128 MOTION proposed Scheduling Order of plaintiffs for consideration in advance of 10/3/11 status/scheduling conference filed by NL Industries, Inc. (not a motion but exhibit of proposed Scheduling Order).So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 10/19/2011. (DRH)
|
|
Filing
47
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss and dismisses Count Two of plaintiff's amended complaint without prejuduce. The Court denies Halliburton's motion in all other respects. Halliburton shall answer the amended complaint within 20 days of entry of this Order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/2/2010. (JMB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
