Battle v. Carroll et al
Ola M. Battle |
David Carroll and Hart Hotels, Inc. |
1:2011cv00624 |
July 21, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Erie |
William M. Skretny |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants' 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING David Carroll as a defendant. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 4/26/2014. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - |
Filing 31 DECISION AND ORDER ASSIGNING Kevin P. Wicka, Esq. pro bono, to represent the Plaintiff in this case. FURTHER, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order and the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses. FURTHER, a Status conference is scheduled for 11/8/2012 at 9:00 AM before William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 10/29/2012. (CMD) |
Filing 27 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff' 22 Motion to extend the deadline for dispositive motions; DENYING Plaintiff's 23 "motion for judgment on the pleadings/motion for default judgment"; CONVERTING the final pretrial conference scheduled for 10/4/2012 at 9:00 a.m. before Chief Judge Skretny to a status conference. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 9/19/2012. (MEAL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.