Hill v. Bradt
Petitioner: Eric D. Hill
Respondent: Mark L. Bradt
Case Number: 1:2013cv00267
Filed: March 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Wyoming
Presiding Judge: Hugh B. Scott
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying Petitioner's request for a writ of habeas corpus an dismissing the petition. (Clerk to close case.) (Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/28/15. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. Bradt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric D. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark L. Bradt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?