Doerr v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Jennifer Mae Doerr
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2013cv00429
Filed: April 29, 2013
Court: New York Western District Court
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Erie
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 14, 2014 15 Opinion or Order of the Court -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP---DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 10 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and denying Plaintiff's 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor the Commissioner and to close this file. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 8/13/2014. (JEC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doerr v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Mae Doerr
Represented By: Richard G. Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.