Teixeria v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
John J. Teixeria |
St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc. |
1:2014cv00789 |
September 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Erie |
Richard J. Arcara |
Hugh B. Scott |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 26 Report and Recommendation; finding as moot 41 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney ; finding as moot 46 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Clerk to close case.) Copy of Decision and Order sent to Plaintiff by first class mail.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 6/30/16. (JMC) |
Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS RE: 18 MOTION for Sanctions MOTION to Strike 8 Amended Complaint filed by St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., St. Jude Medical, Inc.; 4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintif f's Complaint or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment filed by St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., St. Jude Medical, Inc.; and 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Amended Complaint) filed by St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc., Pacesetter, Inc., St. Jude Medical, Inc.Objections due per 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 3/3/2015. (GAI) Modified on 3/3/2015 to correct phrasing in line 13 of page 21 (GAI). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.