Hawkins v. Miller et al
Michael Hawkins |
D. Miller, D. Peterkin and F. Petrino |
1:2020cv01798 |
December 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Lawrence J Vilardo |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of D. Miller, D. Peterkin, F. Petrino against Michael Hawkins. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 1/26/2021. (CGJ) Copy mailed to plaintiff |
Filing 7 ORDER that the case shall be administratively terminated; If the plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. This writing must include either (a) a signed authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total). Upon the plaintiff's submission of either (a) a signed authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total), the Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 1/26/2021. (CGJ) Copy of order, motion form and authorization form mailed to Plaintiff |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Hawkins. (CGJ) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER GRANTING #4 the plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file his IFP documents. If the plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall send to the Court, by February 1, 2021, either (a) a properly supported motion to proceed IFP along with the required certification of his inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total). Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 1/12/2021. (MLA) (Chambers has mailed a copy of this text order to the plaintiff) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Michael Hawkins. (CGJ) |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT in favor of D. Miller, D. Peterkin, F. Petrino against Michael Hawkins. Signed by Mary C. Loewenguth, Clerk of Court on 12/11/2020. (CGJ) Copy mailed to Plaintiff |
Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively terminate this action without filing the complaint or assessing a filing fee. If Hawkins wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify this Court, in writing, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. This writing must include either (a) a properly supported motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification of his inmate trust fund account (or the institutional equivalent) and authorization form or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total). Upon Hawkins's submission of either (a) a complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with the required certification and authorization form, or (b) the $350.00 filing fee and the $50.00 administrative fee ($400.00 total), the Clerk of the Court shall reopen this case. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 12/11/2020. (CGJ) Order and motion form mailed to Plaintiff |
Remark: Clerk mailed copy of #2 and 3 as well as a blank Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to Michael Hawkins. (MD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against D. Miller, D. Peterkin, F. Petrino, filed by Michael Hawkins. (CGJ) |
Remark: Plaintiff has been mailed a pro se packet including a privacy notice, consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, and a civil case timeline. (CGJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.