Malik v. Skelly et al
| Sultan Malik |
| Craig L. Skelly, Randy Banks, Shawn D. Pierson, Timothy J. Hable, Joel R. Ayers, Sean F. Davis and David Napoli |
| 6:2009cv06283 |
| June 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Chemung |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's attorney fee and costs applications (ECF No. 108) are GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $124,904.30 in attorney fees (645.5 attorney hours at $193.50 per hour plus 187 paralegal hou rs at $100 per hour), $2,638.56 in costs, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(d)(2), Plaintiff shall utilize 1% of the jury verdict amount, or $4,000, towards satisfaction of the attorney fee award. The remaining balance of $120,904.30 in attorney fees is payable by Defendants, and is due to Plaintiff's counsel immediately. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/29/17. (SCE)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
46
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 39 Defendant David Napoli's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against him. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 09/23/2013. (ST)
|
|
Filing
31
DECISION AND ORDER denying 6 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 8 Motion to Set Aside Default. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/25/10. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
