Venable v. Morabito et al
| Rason Venable |
| K. Morabito and Dawson Brown |
| 6:2010cv06624 |
| November 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Washington |
| Jonathan W. Feldman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
DECISION AND ORDER granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants motion [#35] for summary judgment is granted, due to Plaintiffs failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The dismissal is with p rejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/19/12. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Discovery. Defense counsel shall file his affidavit and produce any relevant documents within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 9/19/2012. (RJO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
