Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester L.P. v. Town of Irondequoit, New York et al
| Bell Atlantic Mobile of Rochester L.P. |
| Town of Irondequoit, New York, The Town Board Of The Town Of Irondequoit, New York and The Building Department Of The Town Of Irondequoit, New York |
| 6:2011cv06141 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Marian W. Payson |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
DECISION AND ORDER denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 18 Motion for Permanent Injunction; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment.The Court denies Defendants motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 16, and grants Verizons application for summary judgment, ECF No. 18, on all the causes of action in its complaint. Further, the Town of Irondequoit, New York; the Town Board of the Town of Irondequoit, New York; and the Building Department of the Town of Irondequoit, New York, are he reby ordered to approve Verizons application for a special permit to allow construction of the proposed 120-foot monopole to address the Hoover Road Gap. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the injunction. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/31/12. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
