Peterkin v. LaValley

Peterkin v. LaValley

Defendant:	Thomas LaValley
Petitioner:	Don Peterkin
Case Number:	6:2013cv06172
Filed:	April 2, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Clinton
Presiding Judge:	Jonathan W. Feldman
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 20, 2016	Filing 24 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying petitioners request for writ of habeas corpus; and dismissing the petition (Doc.1). Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a co nstitutional right, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Plaintiff.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/20/16. (JMC)
April 16, 2013	Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk of Court is directed to administratively terminate this action without prejudice without filing the petition or assessing a filing fee; Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a form motion to proceed IFP; if petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he shall notify the Court in writing no later 5/17/2013; upon petitioner submissions the Clerk of the Court shall re-open this case. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 4/15/2013. (TA)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 20, 2016

Filing 24 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying petitioners request for writ of habeas corpus; and dismissing the petition (Doc.1). Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a co nstitutional right, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Plaintiff.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/20/16. (JMC)

April 16, 2013

Filing 2 ORDER that the Clerk of Court is directed to administratively terminate this action without prejudice without filing the petition or assessing a filing fee; Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner a form motion to proceed IFP; if petitioner wishes to reopen this action, he shall notify the Court in writing no later 5/17/2013; upon petitioner submissions the Clerk of the Court shall re-open this case. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 4/15/2013. (TA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterkin v. LaValley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Don Peterkin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas LaValley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?