Barnes v. Coughlin
Plaintiff: Andre Barnes
Defendant: James M. Coughlin
Case Number: 6:2014cv06364
Filed: July 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: St. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECISION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 12 is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 06/24/2016. A copy of this Decision and Order and NEF has been mailed to pro se Plaintiff Andre Barnes. -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- (AFM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Coughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James M. Coughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?