Keitz v. Terragnoli et al
| Michael James Keitz |
| Joel Terragnoli, Anthony J. Annucci and Unnamed Director, Ministrerial & Family Services |
| 6:2014cv06600 |
| October 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Ontario |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants motion to dismiss [#11] is granted. Plaintiffs claims are dismissed without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U .S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/5/16. (KAP) COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE NEF SENT TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF (Michael James Keitz, 6037 Route 96, Farmington, NY 14425)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
