Vann v. The City of Rochester et al
| David Vann |
| The City of Rochester, Matther Drake, Steven Mitchell, Jeffrey Kester, Christopher J. Barber, David E. Kephart, Tomesha Angelo, Stephanie Mintz, Daniel J. Zimmerman, Police Officers "John Does 1-6" and Police Officers "John Does 7-12" |
| 6:2018cv06464 |
| June 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 91 Motion for Sanctions; finding as moot 91 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on August 3, 2023. (VSG)
|
|
Filing
29
DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in its entirety. Michael Harrigan and Sandra Doorley are dismissed as defendants; and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in their favor. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 6/27/19. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
27
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: It is ORDERED that City Defendants' request to dismiss the Amended Complaint's seventh claim (violation of the Privacy Protection Act); ninth claim (malicious abuse of process); and thirteenth claim (municipal liability) is granted, and these claims are dismissed with prejudice. It is furthe r ORDERED that the City Defendants' request to dismiss the Amended Complaint's the sixth claim (failure to intervene as to Stephanie Mintz); eighth claim (supervisory liability); tenth claim (deliberate medical indifference); and eleventh a nd twelfth claims (municipal liability) is denied, and these claims may proceed. It is further ORDERED that the City Defendants' request for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e) and the request to strike under Rule 12(f) are denied. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 3/25/2019. (AFB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
