Guthrie v. Ball et al
Plaintiff: Karen Guthrie
Defendant: Gregory Ball and Melissa Rodgers
Case Number: 1:2011cv00333
Filed: November 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Office: Chattanooga Office
County: Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Susan K Lee
Presiding Judge: Harry S Mattice
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 240 ORDER granting in part 138 Motion in Limine #24 to Exclude Any Reference to Pain Management Guidelines. The Court will RESERVE RULING as to whether the 2008 and 2009 pain management guidelines are admissible. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 10/17/2014. (BJL, )
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDER denying 132 " Motion in Limine #18 to Exclude to Exclude Any Argument, Testimony, or Other Evidence Regarding Plaintiffs Claim for Punitive Damages or That Defendant Acted Intentionally [sic], Maliciously, Fraudulently, Or Recklessly." Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 10/14/2014. (BJL, ) Modified on 10/15/2014 (BJL, ).
October 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER granting 105 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on October 9, 2014. (CNC, )
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 209 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on October 9, 2014. (CNC, )
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 204 ORDER granting 84 Motion in Limine. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on October 8, 2014. (CNC, ) Mailed to John W. Pate (CNC)
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER granting, without objection, 88 Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Evidence that Donald Guthrie Ever Took Recreational Drugs During His Lifetime. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 10/3/2014. (BJL, ) Modified on 10/3/2014 (BJL,).***Mailed to Attorney John Pate.
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 9/17/12. (GRE, )
July 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 7/5/12. (GRE, )
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K Lee on 5/16/12. (GRE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guthrie v. Ball et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Guthrie
Represented By: Christopher A Keith
Represented By: Christopher A Keith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?